Posts Tagged ‘real estate’

It’s the Experience, Stupid!

Tuesday, February 9th, 2010

DC3's San Francisco Photostream on Flickr

The epic phrase spoken to Bill Clinton, “It’s the Economy, Stupid!” fueled his rise to presidency. I don’t have any similar aspirations for my title phrase, but I do think it’s one we can all rally around.

We go to Starbucks and pay the equivalent of $30/gallon (if it were gas), for a medium coffee. Why? It’s the experience we crave. The smile and warm greeting when we walk in, and if we’re regulars the simple act of remembering what we ordered last time.

We’ll spend extra time searching for the right restaurant to take our wives or sweeties to this weekend. I’m guessing the food would have been great at any number of places. But if we can find the right experience (the presentation of the food, the lighting, the music, the properly attentive and knowledgeable wait staff), the evening will be memorable!

We pay the big bucks – maybe just once in our lives – to stay at the Ritz Carlton because their stories of the customer experience are legendary.

There’s a common thread to each one of these anecdotes. They all involve people paying more for a truly authentic experience. When the experience meets our ever-increasing standards, do you really ever hear about the cost being the only selective parameter? Almost never. Make no mistake – the product has to deliver. But that’s simply the price of entry. No one expects any less than that the product will meet, and hopefully exceed, their expectations. The trump card in the pile is their experience – which is what you deliver. They don’t know quite what to expect, having been disappointed so many times in the past. And therefore your opportunity to surprise and delight them is more available than perhaps ever before.

It doesn’t matter that we’re in this wonderful retail business called real estate. It’s just Starbucks at a different price level, frankly. Do you want to put an end to the ongoing assault on your homes’ prices and your commission? Just deliver an experience that has them talking about that, and you’ll find them bragging about the great service they got for the commission they paid, and about the incredible house they just purchased and what great value they received. Make that the topic of their next cocktail party. It’s a better conversation starter than, “Hey, can you believe the great price per square foot I just paid for my new home!”. It’s time to turn the discussion around.

It’s All About You!

Thursday, February 4th, 2010

Flickr by NCLee1955

Wow – can it really be all about “me”, when everything I read tells me it’s all about our customers? The reality is, it’s a little of both! As I often said to my mother when I was little and in trouble, “let me splain.”

For years now, information has been ubiquitous. The Internet democratized just about everything for everyone. Want to find out what homes are on the market? Just go to REALTOR.com; Zillow.com; Trulia.com; BDX.com – the list goes on. All free, all a click away. The push was to get information into the hands of our customers. And through that progression of information distribution through the Internet many predicted the demise of the REALTOR, or at least a significant chipping away at the conventional commission structure that followed the transaction. And certainly there’s been some of that.

But what strikes me is…the agent is now more important than ever. Sure, the customers don’t need you in the same way as they did in past years when you kept a firm grip on the 300 page book of MLS listings until they agreed to work with you. They know what’s on the market. They can practically do their own CMAs with the tools that are out there. But their need for you, in reality, is greater than ever before.

The pace of change is astounding. New FHA regs seem to hit the street about once a week. New building codes are affecting how we design and build homes. Contract language becomes ever more complex in this era of chinese drywall and other hot construction litigation topics. And the very devices – from Blackberries to iPads – that are designed to make us more productive eat up more and more of our day. So while our customers may think they can go it on their own, the reality is quite different.

They need you – because time is such a valuable commodity. They need you – because their fear of making a mistake is greater than ever. They need you – to help them navigate the complex world that real estate continues to be.

It’s true in new homes and I’m sure equally true within the resale community – people are a lot more responsible for generating a be-back/return visitor than the builder’s model homes will ever be.

You are the real value in the transaction. Start small, build your tribe of raving fans, let them spread the word about the extraordinary level of service and expertise you provided (and – subsequently – notice how the debate on your commission never comes up) and take some consolation that, every now and then, it really is about you!

Chasing Technology

Wednesday, January 27th, 2010

Just getting started in Kris Berg’s new Vook, “Keeping It Real (estate)” (as always, Kris is great!) and she talks about something that’s been bugging me for a while in this era of ever-emerging, new and better, “gotta-have” technologies. It’s about chasing all the new technologies with the feeling that if you don’t adopt the latest and greatest of everything, you’re behind. The problem is, our customers don’t always see it that way. And the other problem is that along the path of newer and better, we can lose our way. How many times has our focus on the customer in front of us been interrupted by the gentle chiming of the Blackberry? Have we gained a new client, or just lost the one silently fuming next to us?

We’ve heard it countless times before: with high-tech has to come high-touch. But too many of us are forgetting that mantra in the quest for shiny and new. I’m coming to the conclusion that it’s okay to be behind sometimes…as long as I am focused on the right stuff to begin with. There’s only so much time in the day, and it’s becoming easier and easier to forget what is really important. I’m willing to lose the race to Geek 3.0, if it means I can keep Customer 1.0.

Working the Plan

Tuesday, October 27th, 2009

As 2010 approaches, I’m sure we’ll all be reminded of the old saw, “Plan Your Work and Work Your Plan.” As trite as it may sound, there’s something to it. Ever wonder what separates a lot of the top performers from the “also-rans”? It’s often the existence of a focused, written plan that serves as the daily roadmap for where they’re going (and how they avoid getting lost along the way!).

If you’re in the new homes business (not that this exercise isn’t beneficial for all), you have to start your 2010 planning with a look back at some key metrics.

How much traffic (and that includes incoming phone calls and emails) did you generate in 2009? What was your conversion ratio of that traffic? How many of your sales were co-brokered? What was the difference in conversion between site traffic and agent-accompanied traffic? How much was spent on traffic-generating promotion from all sources? How does that break down between cost/traffic unit generated and cost/sale? What was your average closed sales price? What was your cancellation rate (as we all know – only net sales pay the bills)?

Once you’ve quantified these metrics, forward planning can emerge. What we know from years of experience is that rarely do these metrics change radically from one year to the next (outside of significant swings in the economy that may have an overriding dampening or accelerating affect on your sales).

A good place to start is with a net sales goal. Market research can augment your daily experience as to whether that number is realistic. Then apply your cancellation rate and you know what you really have to sell in order to get to your net. If you know your breakdown of where the sales are coming from and how much each unit of traffic is costing you, you can quickly, and quite accurately, develop a marketing budget for the year. It may not answer where you need to spend it, but it will tell you how much you’ll probably have to spend to get there. In an economy that is forcing us all to do more with less, we are tempted to challenge the metrics, to think we can nudge them from their historical levels. But the numbers almost never lie. The most tempting metric to think you can change is the conversion ratio. Sure, there are superstar agents out where who can make a difference in conversion ratios. But with the myriad elements that influence the sale (location, product type, price point, buyer trepidation and the builder’s acumen as a marketer), there are often many things working hard to keep these metrics in check. I’m not saying it can’t be done – we all have stories where we beat the system. But it’s a bad assumption to make when starting your annual planning. Its parallel in our industry is the builder who falls in love with a piece of land, overpays for it and then thinks he/she can force the numbers to work by simply raising the sales prices. Time and again we learn the same lesson when we fail to hit our annual sales goals – that the real challenges is simply not being able to drive enough traffic to the site. It’s a push and pull game, but builders and their agents have to meet in the middle somewhere, with each party having a clear understanding of their role in this whole process.

I was introduced to the X-Factor concept (the fancy name for everything I’ve been talking about) early in my building career by Frank Spadea of Franciscus Homes. 30 years later, it’s still one of the most valuable, tried-and-true tools I have in my planning basket. 2010 is almost upon us. The planning for it needs to be started now, if you haven’t done so already. If you’d like to chat more about X-Factor planning or get a copy of a blank form to start working on your 2010 plan, just email me at tgear@terrypeterson.com.

Much ado…perhaps!

Wednesday, April 29th, 2009

It’s been interesting following Inman News and the ongoing debate about agent compensation. Granted, the majority of the blogging has been about how the traditional resale commission structure may change going forward as companies strive to add value in an era where information is ubiquitous.  I have to side for the most part with Kris Berg  (a wonderful blogger in her own right) that you can’t paint this topic with a broad brush and that agents who earn their commission are worth every cent. Hard to disagree. There are, and will always be, agents who earn it and agents who just stumble onto it.

But it got me thinking about the compensation structure in new home sales as well. I’d say a similar debate is going on – just under the public radar. What are agents “worth”? How do the real estate companies that support them add value and justify their fee structure. Why not go “in-house” and pocket the savings and perhaps pay the broker a fee just to access MLS? It all sounds good on the surface and I’ve seen it all come and go in my 30+ years in the business. And now I guess it’s time to jump in with my two cents worth.

I’m more riled up about something else than counting the pennies I might save by going in-house. I have to say in my many years knocking around new homes that I’ve never seen any industry that so distains their front-line salespeople. All we do as an industry is bitch when they make the big money (and at the same time make their builder clients millions) and insult them with phrases like, “Even a trained monkey could sell right now!” during the boom times. And then we’re content to watch them starve during the inevitable downturns. “Well, they should have saved their money!”

It all baffles me. These folks are our only links to our customers. They have entered a business that forces them to work almost every weekend and miss their kids ballgames, warm days on the beaches and the occasional mid-afternoon Happy Hour. And what for? So they can represent a builder who doesn’t understand basic marketing? Who  can’t design, merchandise and price a product to the market? And these folks don’t even get paid until the home finally closes? Wow – I’d have to think we’d be holding these people in the highest regard, when so often we do just the opposite. I wonder how this pay structure would work with our field superintendents…? And does that mean during the slow times even a trained monkey can build a home when labor is plentiful and anxious to report to the site and get something done? It’s beyond me to consider being that insulting to the trained professionals who strive every day to deliver a zero punchlist home.

So, is it time for a renewed conversation about compensation for new home sales professionals? I think it’s long overdue. Like any business, we have to separate the wheat from the chaff. But once that’s done (and that’s a key management responsibility to begin with, isn’t it?), isn’t it time we started talking about paying these folks a living wage and some benefits, and creating an incentive platform that let’s us all benefit when they blow that monthly goal out of the water?

It seems too obvious a question to even think about posing. But amazingly, I don’t see the debate on this topic even trickling through builder circles. It’s a shame. But somehow in this business we think we can violate Einstein’s tenant, “The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.”


All comments and opinions expressed on this blog do not necessarily represent those of The Terry•Peterson Companies.
Website Design & Hosting by Maurice Design LLC