Posts Tagged ‘agents’

Working the Plan

Tuesday, October 27th, 2009

As 2010 approaches, I’m sure we’ll all be reminded of the old saw, “Plan Your Work and Work Your Plan.” As trite as it may sound, there’s something to it. Ever wonder what separates a lot of the top performers from the “also-rans”? It’s often the existence of a focused, written plan that serves as the daily roadmap for where they’re going (and how they avoid getting lost along the way!).

If you’re in the new homes business (not that this exercise isn’t beneficial for all), you have to start your 2010 planning with a look back at some key metrics.

How much traffic (and that includes incoming phone calls and emails) did you generate in 2009? What was your conversion ratio of that traffic? How many of your sales were co-brokered? What was the difference in conversion between site traffic and agent-accompanied traffic? How much was spent on traffic-generating promotion from all sources? How does that break down between cost/traffic unit generated and cost/sale? What was your average closed sales price? What was your cancellation rate (as we all know – only net sales pay the bills)?

Once you’ve quantified these metrics, forward planning can emerge. What we know from years of experience is that rarely do these metrics change radically from one year to the next (outside of significant swings in the economy that may have an overriding dampening or accelerating affect on your sales).

A good place to start is with a net sales goal. Market research can augment your daily experience as to whether that number is realistic. Then apply your cancellation rate and you know what you really have to sell in order to get to your net. If you know your breakdown of where the sales are coming from and how much each unit of traffic is costing you, you can quickly, and quite accurately, develop a marketing budget for the year. It may not answer where you need to spend it, but it will tell you how much you’ll probably have to spend to get there. In an economy that is forcing us all to do more with less, we are tempted to challenge the metrics, to think we can nudge them from their historical levels. But the numbers almost never lie. The most tempting metric to think you can change is the conversion ratio. Sure, there are superstar agents out where who can make a difference in conversion ratios. But with the myriad elements that influence the sale (location, product type, price point, buyer trepidation and the builder’s acumen as a marketer), there are often many things working hard to keep these metrics in check. I’m not saying it can’t be done – we all have stories where we beat the system. But it’s a bad assumption to make when starting your annual planning. Its parallel in our industry is the builder who falls in love with a piece of land, overpays for it and then thinks he/she can force the numbers to work by simply raising the sales prices. Time and again we learn the same lesson when we fail to hit our annual sales goals – that the real challenges is simply not being able to drive enough traffic to the site. It’s a push and pull game, but builders and their agents have to meet in the middle somewhere, with each party having a clear understanding of their role in this whole process.

I was introduced to the X-Factor concept (the fancy name for everything I’ve been talking about) early in my building career by Frank Spadea of Franciscus Homes. 30 years later, it’s still one of the most valuable, tried-and-true tools I have in my planning basket. 2010 is almost upon us. The planning for it needs to be started now, if you haven’t done so already. If you’d like to chat more about X-Factor planning or get a copy of a blank form to start working on your 2010 plan, just email me at tgear@terrypeterson.com.

Much ado…perhaps!

Wednesday, April 29th, 2009

It’s been interesting following Inman News and the ongoing debate about agent compensation. Granted, the majority of the blogging has been about how the traditional resale commission structure may change going forward as companies strive to add value in an era where information is ubiquitous.  I have to side for the most part with Kris Berg  (a wonderful blogger in her own right) that you can’t paint this topic with a broad brush and that agents who earn their commission are worth every cent. Hard to disagree. There are, and will always be, agents who earn it and agents who just stumble onto it.

But it got me thinking about the compensation structure in new home sales as well. I’d say a similar debate is going on – just under the public radar. What are agents “worth”? How do the real estate companies that support them add value and justify their fee structure. Why not go “in-house” and pocket the savings and perhaps pay the broker a fee just to access MLS? It all sounds good on the surface and I’ve seen it all come and go in my 30+ years in the business. And now I guess it’s time to jump in with my two cents worth.

I’m more riled up about something else than counting the pennies I might save by going in-house. I have to say in my many years knocking around new homes that I’ve never seen any industry that so distains their front-line salespeople. All we do as an industry is bitch when they make the big money (and at the same time make their builder clients millions) and insult them with phrases like, “Even a trained monkey could sell right now!” during the boom times. And then we’re content to watch them starve during the inevitable downturns. “Well, they should have saved their money!”

It all baffles me. These folks are our only links to our customers. They have entered a business that forces them to work almost every weekend and miss their kids ballgames, warm days on the beaches and the occasional mid-afternoon Happy Hour. And what for? So they can represent a builder who doesn’t understand basic marketing? Who  can’t design, merchandise and price a product to the market? And these folks don’t even get paid until the home finally closes? Wow – I’d have to think we’d be holding these people in the highest regard, when so often we do just the opposite. I wonder how this pay structure would work with our field superintendents…? And does that mean during the slow times even a trained monkey can build a home when labor is plentiful and anxious to report to the site and get something done? It’s beyond me to consider being that insulting to the trained professionals who strive every day to deliver a zero punchlist home.

So, is it time for a renewed conversation about compensation for new home sales professionals? I think it’s long overdue. Like any business, we have to separate the wheat from the chaff. But once that’s done (and that’s a key management responsibility to begin with, isn’t it?), isn’t it time we started talking about paying these folks a living wage and some benefits, and creating an incentive platform that let’s us all benefit when they blow that monthly goal out of the water?

It seems too obvious a question to even think about posing. But amazingly, I don’t see the debate on this topic even trickling through builder circles. It’s a shame. But somehow in this business we think we can violate Einstein’s tenant, “The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.”


All comments and opinions expressed on this blog do not necessarily represent those of The Terry•Peterson Companies.
Website Design & Hosting by Maurice Design LLC